The Stranger (The Outsider), Nausea, and Death on the Installment Plan :: comparison compare contrast essays

The curious (The Outsider), Nausea, and Death on the installment Plan The Stranger, by Albert Camus, Nausea, by Jean-Paul Sartre, and Death on the Installment Plan, by Louis-Ferdinand Celine, all contrast themselves with internal texts that fail to represent the world competently. The Stranger includes the prosecutors narrative of the murders as an incompetent text by refusing to support the motives he assigns. It contrasts itself with the prosecutors narrative in view of the excessive language of the prosecutor versus the naive reporting of Meursault. The Stranger similarly positions comments by Marie and Raymond as incompetent by contrasting their pity with the texts own view that no counterbalancet is in truth pitiable. Nausea positions a text by Balzac as incompetent be precedent it assigns cause to events by using psychology and past time. The novel includes paintings of a obdurate bachelor and bourgeois grandfather as incompetent texts. Nausea excessively p ositions the Self-Taught Mans description of attempt as incompetent by arguing that adventure is a social construct. Death on the Installment Plan label an effusive letter to Courtial as incompetent, in contrast with Ferdinands stance of reporting. It as well as positions Courtials pamphlets promoting an outdoor education as incompetent by showing that they belie Courtials intentions and ability. Death also uses Augustes letter to Ferdinand as an attempt to bend Ferdinand to the set of the bourgeoisie, which he questions. Each of the three texts increase its own verisimilitude through its understood comparison with inadequate internal texts. The Stranger contrasts its narrative of the murder of the Arab with the prosecutors narrative, in terms of the faulty motives that the prosecutor ascribes to Meursault. The prosecutor provides a cause for all(prenominal) of Meursaults actions. Meursault summarizes the prosecutors case I had asked Raymond to give me his gun. I had gone back just intending to use it. I had shot the Arab as I planned . . . And to educate sure I had done the job right, I fired quadruple more shots (99). However, the text does not assign these causes to the murder. As Meursault approaches the Arab, he realizes that as removed as I was concerned, the whole thing was over, and Id gone there without even thinking about it (58).