Lowering the Drinking Age in America Essay Example for Free

Lowering the crapulence era in America EssayBeing cardinal in the United States of America gives each citizen a newborn freedom. However when it manages to the consumption of intoxicant, being eighteen restricts one from being every last(predicate)owed to ratifiedly defile, or throw inebriant. The most debatable topic a supporter of changing the inebriation age would argue, is that if citizens ar middle-aged enough to fight for our estate, they should be able to purchase an alcoholic beverage. The consumption of alcohol age should be lowered to eighteen for economic purposes to take in the nation, and the number of drunk driving accidents could littleen. Due to just most of these reasons, the legal imbibition age should be lowered from twenty-one to eighteen. If one is recognized as a legal adult, with the ability to make decisions independently, the consumption of alcohol should be held to ones discretion.When one turns eighteen, there are many a(prenominal ) decisions that can be made, but alcohol is not one of them. The ingestion of alcoholic beverages should be at ones own pleasure. With every decision made in life there is a cause and case some(prenominal) can be either good or bad. Some privileges given to an eighteen family old American with the ability to encounter decisions to make independently include the ability to vote, marry, smoke a cigarette (in most states), enlist in the military, give sexual consent, apply for a deferred payment card, and buy a home.The same way the consent is given to postulate in sexual intercourse, there is danger of getting pregnant. Every time cigarette is lit, the number of chances of getting lung cancer increase. Without self-control, a newly obtained credit card can instantly become maxed out (pros and cons. 2014, July 18). Although, if one practices moderation the consequences listed above can be preventable. Thus being the case, because why would it not be substantial to consume alcoh ol? The drunkenness age should not be postponed to the age of twenty-one solely because if an individual can make responsible decisions based on their own body, they should urinate the secure to do so.From the early stages of our mental development, we are taught what is right and what is wrong. Being eighteen or twenty-one does not change the logic of drunkenness until the point of drinking is not what is best for you. Whether you are eighteen or twenty-one, understanding that operating a vehicle, while intoxicated, is both a hazard to yourself and others on the road, the individual just needs to be responsible. The National Minimum swallow Age Act, was enforced during FDRs presidency, is initiated by MADD, (Mothers Against Drunk Driving) to eliminate less mature eighteen year olds, from having alcohol in their possession. (Pros and cons. 2014, July 18).However, what many fail to realize is that before the MDAA was enacted, the number of drunk driving fatalities decreased am ong all age groups and demographics, leaving this Act irresponsible for the positive shift in gild, in 1980. There were few drinking and driving fatalities worldwide in countries that do not prohibit eighteen year olds from eat alcohol. In 1980, America had less drunk driving related fatalities than any other European country with legal drinking ages under twenty-one. (Pros and cons. 2014, July 18). If the United States lowers the drinking age to eighteen, the number of drunk driving fatalities could decrease just like Europe.Movements generate been set forth to help politicians realize how beneficial changing the legal age would be. In 2008, college presidents launched the Amethyst initiative, which supports the idea of lowering the drinking age to promote moderation and disgrace risks common for imbibers at a younger age. This initiative recognized drunk driving as a serious problem however it is not the only danger targeting underage drinkers. They contend that by allowing colleges and universities to have alcohol openly available to all inhabitants of its campus, risk featureors such as drinking-fueled violence, alcohol poisoning, and drunken injuries would be eliminated on campuses. Essentially, because the college and/or university would be able to educate their students on the dangers of consuming alcohol, now they could take presidency agency in the activity effectively. (Cary, Mary Kate.7 May 2014)Psychologically, lowering the drinking age would eliminate many insubordinate individuals from seeking the consumption of illegal alcohol. Many people setout to do things they know are not allowed, just for the fun of it. If eighteen year olds were allowed to drink, they would not be more likely to engage in the act or be able to put themselves in harms way. In todays society, underage drinking is understood as the norm however, it is still frowned upon. Accidents caused by drinking, is what causes the downfall of a teens drinking experience, mainl y due(p) to the fact it is looked down upon. Whether the teen was sneaking around so the cops, or their parents, would not scold them for drinking, or their friend gets sick but does not want to get in trouble for having alcohol and allow their friend die. More related incidents come because of avoiding the consequences of the law. If this law of the legal drinking age did not exist, then things would turn around for the better.For example, the first time a teen gets to experience their first drink, they are less inclined to practice moderation because they understand that it is not something they are allowed to do or can intimately do often, causing the teen to risk alcohol poisoning. If the consequences of underage drinking could potentially lead to jail, compassionate nature would trigger the individual to leave the scene of the accident before they are jeopardized too. If drinking were allowed and an eighteen year old just had too much to drink that night, then calling an am bulance and seeking health check attention would not be the last thing in that individuals mind because they would not fear their livelihood. Relating blanket to understanding what is right or wrong, self-preservation usually overrides doing what is better for someone else, rather than themselves. More harm has come from having the drinking age at twenty-one because alcohol is still going to be consumed whether it is legally or illegally.Raising the age of alcohol consumption has not eliminated underage drinking completely in fact a majority of alcohol is consumed by underage drinkers. The National Center on Addiction and gist Abuse found that 17.5% of underage drinking accounts revenue was from underage buyers. Another study, completed in 2006 acknowledge that about 72.2% of twelfth graders in America admitted to having drunk alcohol. Since a large amount of alcohol is illegally obtained, the number of citizens complying with government regulations has declined.If anything, un derage drinking has promoted the use of creating, selling and buying false identification. In todays societywhere identity theft is a common concern and national security concerns are always in high alert due to illegal circulation of documents, in lieu of fraud, immigrations and terrorism, having fewer false identifications circulating passim the United States would be safer for our nation and would show more respect for the law from its citizens (public health spot, 23,May 2014).Haste makes molder and what the government fails to realize is that aside from the perk of the well being of an eighteen year old drinker being increased, the economy can then benefit too. By changing the nominal legal drinking age to eighteen, more people would have access to legal alcohol, which would raise sales across the board. This would benefit small businesses, bars, restaurants, clubs and any other licensed establishment in the country. Also, more job opportunities will aggrandize due to the i ncrease in consumers, and the overall increase in demand. If alcohol sales increased, then the government would be able to collect larger amounts of tax revenue and greatly reduce spending on anti-alcohol campaigns.If so many positive outcomes could come from changing the legal drinking age from twenty-one to eighteen then why are the states not arguing to keep their legal drinking age at eighteen fighting back to regain their once acquired right? While it is indefinitely argued that state governments should have the right to establish their own legal drinking age, the federal government puts a hold on the states economy by allowing the age to be changed.The federal government threatened to withhold 10% of track funding from any state that resisted complying with the act. Yet again, the federal government took a step forward and pressured their option on states decisions regarding monetary affairs, forcing the states to choose from losing millions in annual highway funds or keepin g their minimum legal drinking age at eighteen (Pros and cons, 2014. July18).We see there are many legal, psychological, economic and moral prospective points that benefit the drinking age to be lowered to eighteen. Changing the national drinking age to 18 will secure safety among teens across the nation, assist the economy, and act on promoting alcohol moderation byhaving it obtainable by those who choose to drink.ReferencesProCon.org. (2014, July 18). _Minimum Legal Drinking Age_ http//drinkingage.procon.org/Cary, Mary Kate. Lower the U.S. Drinking Age. _US News_. U.S.News World Report, 7 May 2014. Web. 27 Oct. 2014.Public Health Spotlight. _Vermont Department of Health_. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Oct. 2014.Selective assistance System Welcome. _Selective Service System Welcome_. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Oct. 2014.U.S. Office of Personnel Management Www.OPM.gov. _U.S. Office of Personnel Management_. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Oct. 2014.2014 Stop small Drinking Portal of federal official Resources. _2014 Stop Underage Drinking Portal of Federal Resources_. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Oct. 2014.Protecting Youth. _Protecting Youth_. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Oct. 2014.2014 Stop Underage Drinking Portal of Federal Resources. _2014 Stop Underage Drinking Portal of Federal Resources_. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Oct. 2014.Accessibility Information. _Programs_. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Oct. 2014.