Ancient Art: How It Affects Society Today Essay

Ancient graphics has a undated value on how it affects society today. In order to interop seasonte each lock of art, an individual must have a full greetledgeable invention of how to define each piece. This essay defines each the Mona Lisa created by da Vinci Da Vinci and the genus genus genus Venus de milo sculpted by Alexandros of Antioch. It defines the form, subject consequence, and content for both pieces. The comparison between both pieces is very(prenominal) much different in concepts, but the meaning of both, hold so much of value is very similar by level of representation.Ancient ArtArt indoors itself defines who we argon as individuals through the way we express our feelings, emotions, expressions, and things we create. Looking at the Mona Lisa created by Leonardo Da Vinci, this was certainly a masterpiece that captured the eyeball of many through its meaning and design. In a resemblance to art, the Venus de milo maize created by Alexandros of Antioch, was a spect acular sculpture that was dated rearward to 100BC and speaks too many about its characteristic. There are many different outlooks to define each artwork such as the form, subject matter, and its content. Relating art to its time is a crucial aspect to know and understand what have meaning during that time. The form of the work is a very crucial aspect to apply when feel at art work. The Mona Lisa is a two-dimensional inunct painting on a panel of wood. The painting technique Leonardo da Vinci used was called sfumato (the Italian word for smoke) which involves using several obvious layers of color to produce depth in the painting. It is quiet unknown how Leonardo applied the paint as there is no obvious evidence of brush strokes or use of fingers. As for the Venus de Milo, it was a three-dimensional sculpture created out of Italian marble which is a hard st star that has a fine grain which allows for it to be carven with a high degree of detail. concord to Lee (2013), The Ven us de Milo was carved from at least six to seven gag laws of Parian marble one block for the nude torso, another(prenominal) block for the draped legs, another block apiece for each arm, another small block for the left foot, another block for the inscribed plinth and finally the separately carved herm that stood beside the goddess. on the face of it the two differ in many different perspectives. First, sculpting and painting are two different forms of art but the intensive meaning posterior both of them represent how much impact art has on society.The real and techniques varied in many different aspects as well and the color, whereas marble wasnt available in different color schemes. The subject matter seat each piece was a representational outlook for extremely respected and loved individuals. From what an individual can gather immediately looking at the Mona Lisa is that, from the sad expression on her face shows meaning behind her life. As for the Venus de Milo, individual s could gather it was someone of value in that era of time. Each with a powerful meaning behind each, but for those who know very little about art could not literally see what it was actually representing. The content to these two masterpieces are very significant in meaning.The Mona Lisa Possessed a very interesting meaning behind the painting. The recognize of which the Mona Lisa was fertilizen was from Lisa del Giocondo, the wife of a wealthy Florence businessman. In modern Italian, mona center my lady or madam, so the title means Madam Lisa. According to Gwen Bruno (2009), the portrait really represents the former Duchess of Milan, Isabella of Aragon and that her sad expression is due to her hard-pressed marriage. The sculpture of Venus de Milo is the representation of the Greek goddess of love and beauty, is meant to be the depiction of pure beauty and perfection, (Mike De uprise, 2008).The action and modernized drapery give the Venus great nobility of a goddess. Accordin g to Mike De Rose (2008), the Venus de Milo represents the girl that this man can never have, and acts as a fantasy for him. When Dario writes in the impossible embrace of the Venus de Milo, he is portraying how it would be impossible to hold or even touch this girl. The time periods from which these were created were of substantial value to those of its time. The Mona Lisa to a greater extent accurately fits the verbal description of so by customs and values during that time. The Venus de Milo was more theory opposed to a literal value because she was of creation. Both of the interminable pieces of art entrust forever hold their value and meaning and will always be cherished.References* Gwen Bruno. (2009). What Does the Mona Lisa Represent? Demand Media Inc. RetrievedJanuary 25, 2013 from http//www.ehow.com/facts_6175839_mona-lisa-represent_.html ** Lee. (2013). What was the Venus De Milo make of?. Yahoo Inc. Retrieved January 25, 2013from http//answers.yahoo.com/question/index?q id=20070220141508AA8kRqO ** Mike De Rose. (2008). The impossible embrace of the Venus de Milo. Mercyhurst.edu.Retrieved January 25, 2013 from * http//plato.mercyhurst.edu/english/breed/www/I%20Seek%20A%20Form/Venus%20de%20Milo.htm *