How Slippery is the Slope? Essay

How Slippery is the Slope?There is no smooth dip toward loss of liberties, notwithstanding a long staircase where each step batchward must first be tolerated by the Ameri commode people and their leaders. Alan K. Simpson. The essay, Chapter 6 The Slippery Slope, is a break down on how ineffective and illogical the slippy slope fallacy is in an line of reasoning against gay marriage. Initially it presents the forebode which is the slippery slope essay, and whence it breaks it down by four categories being (1) slipping to absurdity, (2) slipping the different way, (3) slippery slopes in general, (4) fantasy of choice. Within this essay it undoubtedly does a reasoned job of disproving this counter leaning through the references ability to practice pathos, intelligence, and ethos in a coherent and comm finish upable way.The first category discusses how absurd it is to clutch that if gay marriage was wakelessized then eventually polygamy, incestuous, and even pedophiliac m arriages would all ready to be legalized. In the second category it is a reminder that the slopes can slip in much direction, so their theory could back give the gate and the slope could slip into more support for not only the LGBT community, only too for those who atomic number 18 mentally handicapped and those with sexually transmitted diseases. As the third category states slippery slopes in general are a bad idea and are illogical and the fourth category recognizes that states, in addition to the aforementioned reasons, a distinction between gay marriages and polyandrous and incestuous marriages can be made based on the concept of choice.This fallacy is extremely weak in any sort of rational debate because the tactic of it is to fly off into a many other situations that are, more often than not, ridiculous and do not usually relate specifically to the top of the slope issue, and this essay is a good tilt showing the flaws in the slippery slope argument against legali zing gay marriage. parole was a heavy factor in this argumentative essay. The spring uses discussion to debate the logic of the slippery slope argument, which in and of itself, is a precise illogical argument tactic and the author knows that so it uses that as the primary(prenominal) way to attack it. A prime example of this use of logos isin the third category called slippery slopes in general and the author said, It is disingenuous, and callous, to treat any potential change as part of or so seamless process of an alleged disintegration of an institution. That being said, that iss not the only example of the author employ logos to reason out the counter, there is a plethora of logos used throughout the essay such as this excerpt, The very notion is manifestly ridiculous. Gay marriage is a legal and moral issue distinct from these others, and it as best disingenuous to argue that its legalization will force the government to recognize the sanctity of a human bond with an ani mal or a dead person.In any debate or argument dealing with civil rights are very pathos-centric, because how can one not be delirious when dealing with the rights of human beings? It is incredibly important to appeal to those emotions which are very justly tools in persuasion and can attract the proper audience and if the emotions are strong enough it can persuade the counters facial expression too. If you havent figured it out by now, slippery slopes fall apartt usually have much logical sway. Usually, they can be outright dismissed on their face, using sentences like this and like this, mating has breakd for the better many times over the years, and will likely evolve even further in years to come, are great ways to add a bit of emotional impact on the audience. to a fault the other sources they use, such as the quote from Andrew Sullivan, help add more emotional impact because what the quotes says.Ethos is also an integral part of this essay, without credibility then the argument has no foundation and gives the audience no reason to swear in the author. The major way that the author uses ethos is through the style of their writing, its very academically put together and very formally, which not a lot of essays on this subject on the internet are. There is cited sources and very formal language used you could even say that the authors use of more intellectual vocabulary might also be an additive to their credibility. The citations they use in this article really help with the authors credibility, because they are linked in so if anyone were to try and dispute what was said to be cited they could go without delay to the source and that is massive credibility points. Inversely, the lack of too much ethos is also a major part of this essay. If it were to have too much emotionalcontinent not only would it seem less formal thus less credible, it would also turn off those who are apart of the counter to the gay rights movement by making them feel bad o r making them angry because the authors use of emotional content.So in the end it appears as though the slope is not so slippery afterward all, the counter arguments author failed to recognize how this logical fallacy is almost laughed at when brought to a serious argument. It has no foothold, it basically only lasting to exist and should not be taken seriously by anyone with half a brain. It is imperative to realize that opposition only uses this method in a last ditch effort to coax the deep end into accept their side over the other, but its also important that in any argument both side can, and may resort to using this argumentative tactic no matter how fallacious and ignorant it appears. The author made solid, valid, and most importantly, logical points to break down the other argument showing how ridiculous it really was to try and use the slippery slope style.