Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein Essay

Frankenstein is a book about earths thirst for know takege, about the focusing he is not satisfied unless he knows all the wonders of the earthly concern. In some(prenominal) cases, this freighter bequeath to the conclusion of a mans soul, as it did to cropmaster Frankenstein. His bespeak to learn the secrets of heaven and earth ended in disaster. The hellion was the embodiment of evil-minded, bringing conclusion and destruction wherever it situated foot. It brought death to Frankensteins family, in a pure quest for r pull downge. emblematic of near evil, the lusus naturae was manmade. In m any ways bloody shame Shelleys life give the bounce be compared to that of schoolmaster Frankensteins.Mary must endure felt that wherever she went, evil followed, as those closest to her were snatched away. She visualised this in Frankenstein as Victors family was destroyed by the ogre, symbolic of the evil she felt followed her. Marys marriage is also represented in Frankens tein. Marys marriage to Percy Shelley was the happiest time of her life before he was kil lead. In the similar way, Victors marriage to Elizabeth was the only gratification he had felt in a long time, when just as suddenly she was murdered by the monster, again symbolising the evil that Mary felt killed her husband.Mary also describes very vividly the pain that Victor felt, leading us to cogitate that she must have felt the same pain and agony. She reveals this in many situations such as the quotes, the overflowing adversity I now felt, and the excess of agitation that I endured rendered me incapable of any exertion and, a fiend had snatched from me every chance of future gratification no creature had ever been so miserable as I was. The destruction of the story was that the death of Victor Frankenstein led the monster to believe that his work was done, and so the monster burned himself to death.The creation had ironically led to the death of the creator. Mary believed that in the event of a mans demise, the evil in posture him dies as well. Frankenstein contains a sad ending, with the destruction of a whole family due to a mans insatiable quest for knowledge. Marys life also consisted of a sad ending, in which she was never as happy as she was when with her husband. She died a lonely death, without her love ones surrounding her, the same fate shared by Victor Frankenstein. The monster in Frankenstein preserve be compared to the beast in Lord of the Flies. on that point are both similarities and differences.In both novels, the idea of a monster/beast represents the pure manifestation of evil. Mutually they lead to the destruction and death of those around them. They are equally spawned from the mind and hands of humans. They both earlier spring from the minds of humans. To explain, in Lord of the Flies is the imagination of the boys representing evil, and in Frankenstein it is Victors wild imagination and thirst for intellect that leads to the creatio n of the monster. in time, this can also be viewed as a particular dissimilarity. In Frankenstein, the monster is bodily real and physically inflicts harm on Victors family.However in Lord of the Flies the beast is just as deadly and evil, but is internal the childrens minds. William Golding was born(p) in Cornwall in 1911. His family was progressive and it was the first source of influence for Goldings talent. He study physics and English literature at Marlboro and Oxford University of England. From the first years of his life, he faced the atrocities of warfare. Fuelled with stories his parents related to him about the first war, he took part in the second great war by joining the British navy blue at 1940. After the war, William became a teacher at a boys school in Salisbury. Here, he started to act as a writer.He sight many children in their natural environment, and must have witnessed the negative side of a childs nature limitless number of times. This led him to write L ord Of The Flies which was his first published book. William Golding lived through the both biggest wars in history. During his time in the Navy, he had a constant reminder of the evil and brutality in the hearts of men. He maxim countless lives lost around him, some belonging to his friends. It had been revealed to him that the pure evil inside a man can start world wars. This, along with his belief experiences, was his incentive to write Lord Of The Flies.After surviving the war, he saw during his teaching that children were not bereft of evil either. Combining these two topics he wrote Lord Of The Flies, the conflict between humanitys innate tongue and the civilizing influence of reason. In the book, he portrays knave as the embodiment of evil. It is Jacks thirst for power that causes the breakdown of civilisation. In this way, Jack can be compared to Hitler. Jack did not want to stop murdering until the whole of Ralphs group were killed. In the same way, Hitler did not wan t to stop until the world was rid of Jews.Jacks tribe wore face paint whereas Hitler and the Nazis wore the property of the Swastika on their arms. Jack is aided in his quest of destruction by Roger, who can be compared to the Nazis. Roger also represents pure evil and wrongness, moreso even than Jack. He derived sadistic pleasure from torturing pigs and the other boys on the island. Similarly, the Nazis torment the Jews from which they obtained a sick sense of fulfilment. Roger is one of Jacks most loyal helpers, and gladly carries out his orders, in the same manner the Nazis obeyed Hitler. The ending of the novel can be interpreted in two variant ways.The first would be to interpret that William Golding does actually have a compulsory outlook on life and believes that the end of life will be a happy one. This can be portrayed as the maritime officer who has come to end the evil and escape the boys from the clutches of death, and thereof the arrival of authority seems like a happy and ironic ending. However if one digs deeper it is just a continuation from one war to another. Once all the boys get on the Navy cruiser, theyll most probable just be subjected to more battle and fighting, this time on a worldwide level, due to the war taking place in the external world.To conclude, the common theme in both novels was the evil in man. some(prenominal) authors had their own experiences that led them to believe that evil resides amongst all of us. They both took their experiences and portrayed them in novels filled with symbolism. Mary Shelley believed that evil is constantly around us, and that no-one can escape. She believed that man has an evil inside of him so powerful that it can lead to the destruction of his own soul. William Goldings understanding was that every man is born with evil inside him.He didnt believe in mans innocence after the second world war. He ground that even children are not innocent, saying, No one is innocent until the guild an d the way of his life make him to pretend that hes innocent. except sometimes, when a man is facing a difficult situation then(prenominal) he will probably show his other nature, the dark and finable nature. Shyam Kanabar Show preview only The above preview is unformatted text This scholarly person written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Mary Shelley section.